What critical literary approaches are used in each article to describe Charles Chesnutt's writing?
Explain how Eric J. Sundquist’s article “Chesnutt’s Revision of Uncle Remus”, uses the critical approaches: New Historicism, formalist writing, and readers response. Then explain how in Candace Waid’s article “Conjuring the Conjugal: Chesnutt’s Scenes from Marriage” uses aspects from Marxism, Hegel’s Master/Slave Dialect, formalist writing, and feminist writing. You can compare and contrast the articles or talk about one then the other. (Full articles in description box) How do the critical approaches each author takes enable him/her to see the primary material in certain ways? What are the advantages and disadvantages of the approach for reading this author and this text?